Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Preoperative serum levels of sialyl Lewis(a), sialyl Lewis(x), and sialyl Tn antigens as prognostic markers after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors: T, Nakagoe; T, Sawai; T, Tsuji; M A, Jibiki; A, Nanashima; H, Yamaguchi; T, Yasutake; +3 Authors

Preoperative serum levels of sialyl Lewis(a), sialyl Lewis(x), and sialyl Tn antigens as prognostic markers after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Abstract

In this study, we examined the preoperative serum levels of sialyl Lewisa, sialyl LewisX, sialyl Tn, and carcinoembryonic antigen in 243 colorectal cancer patients in order to clarify the role of these antigens as prognostic factors after curative surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: low and high antigen groups (lower and higher than a selected diagnostic-based cut-off value). Patients with high serum levels of sialyl Lewisa and carcinoembryonic antigen had shorter disease-free intervals than those with low serum levels of the respective antigen, although sialyl Lewisx and sialyl Tn showed no significant differences. Multivariate analysis revealed that three independent prognostic variables, including depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and serum sialyl Lewisa level, did prove to have value in predicting disease-free interval. In conclusion, among the four antigens examined in this study, the preoperative serum level of sialyl Lewisa is the only independent prognostic variable for recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, CA-19-9 Antigen, Oligosaccharides, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Disease-Free Survival, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Gangliosides, Lymphatic Metastasis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Colorectal Neoplasms, Sialyl Lewis X Antigen, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!