Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The thickness change and clinical significance of tunica intima and smooth muscle in artery after hydrolic dilation].

Authors: C Y, Fan; B F, Zeng; S P, Sui;

[The thickness change and clinical significance of tunica intima and smooth muscle in artery after hydrolic dilation].

Abstract

To study the proliferation change of tunica intima and smooth muscle in artery after hydrolic dilation for potential clinical use.Sixten adult New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups, named group A, B, C and D. Right carotid arteries of rabbits of those 4 groups were dilated by hydrolic dilation with different pressures with 0 kPa, 40 kPa, 80 kPa, and 120 kPa respectively. The arterial calibers, thickness of tunica intima and smooth muscle were analyzed by automatic medical photograph analyzer immediately, 1 week and 2 weeks later respectively.The arterial calibers in the experimental group were larger than those in control group after immediate hydrolic dilation and 1 week later (P 0.05), and those in group C were larger than that of group A (P 0.05) after immediate hydrolic dilation. At 1 and 2 weeks after dilation, there were no significant difference between group A and group B (P > 0.05), and those in group C and D were all larger than those in group A (P < 0.01). No obvious proliferation of tunica intima were observed in group B at 2 weeks after hydrolic dialation, but the proliferation of tunica intima could be observed in group C and D, especially in group D.Caliber of artery can be expanded by hydrolic dilation with higher pressure, but the proliferation of tunica intima and smooth muscle may be occurred in hydrolic dilation with higher pressure over 80 kPa, therefore it is safe to use hydrolic dilation with pressure no more than 40 kPa.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Random Allocation, Carotid Arteries, Animals, Rabbits, Tunica Intima, Dilatation, Muscle, Smooth, Vascular

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!