Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal healing following flap debridement surgery

Authors: SCABBIA, Alessandro; K. S. CHO; C. K. KIM; T. SIGURDSSON; TROMBELLI, Leonardo;

Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal healing following flap debridement surgery

Abstract

The purpose of the present parallel-design, controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the treatment outcome following flap debridement surgery (FDS) procedures in smokers compared to non-smokers. 58 systemically healthy subjects with moderate to advanced periodontitis, who presented one area (3 to 6 teeth) with persisting diseased sites after initial therapy, were selected. 29 patients (mean age: 39.7 years, 20 males) were smokers, while 29 patients (mean age: 43.9 years, 7 males) were non-smokers. Full-mouth plaque (PlI) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) scores, probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed immediately before surgery and at 6 months postsurgery. PlI and BoP scores significantly decreased in both smokers and non-smokers. PD reduction and CAL gain were greater in non-smokers (2.4  0.9 mm and 1.6  0.7 mm, respectively) than in smokers (2.0  0.9 mm and 1.2  0.8 mm, respectively), however these differences did not reach the statistical significance. When sites presenting baseline PD  7 mm were considered, smokers showed significantly less PD reduction (3.1  1.1 mm) and CAL gain (1.9  1.2 mm) compared to non-smokers (3.9  0.8 mm and 2.8  1.0 mm, respectively). In smokers, there was a significant difference in mean CAL change in patients with exposure >15 packs/years (0.9  0.5 mm) compared to those with lower exposure (1.5  0.8 mm). The results of this study suggest that healing outcome following FDS procedures is impaired in cigarette smokers. This study was partly supported by MURST grant #97/60/06/014.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!