Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Protective role and in vitro activity of fractions extracted from Lactococcus garvieae, the lactococcosis agent in rainbow trout (O. mykiss)

Authors: VOLPATTI, Donatella; B. CONTESSI; E. BUONASERA; GALEOTTI, Marco;

Protective role and in vitro activity of fractions extracted from Lactococcus garvieae, the lactococcosis agent in rainbow trout (O. mykiss)

Abstract

Effective protocols of vaccination against lactococcosis in rainbow trout (O. mykiss) are still under investigation and the methods currently employed are based on “autovaccines” that are injected intraperitoneally to fish (Bercovier et al., 1997; Prearo, 2006). These vaccines allow a protection for 8 months, when integrated with adjuvants (Ravelo et al, 2006). The bacterial antigenic components involved in the protection are only partially considered by the literature. This investigation evaluated the effect of some fractions of L. garvieae (strain B05/3) in the development of a protective immune response to the infection. Extra cellular products (ECPs), bacterial whole cells (WCs) and membrane antigens (MAs) were injected intraperitoneum to 90g rainbow trouts. Fish were subsequently submitted to an intraperitoneal challenge with L. garvieae (2.6×105 cfu/individual). The relative percentages of survival (RPS) were 95% for WCs, 35% for ECPs and 33% for MAs. These results suggest that WCs provided the best protection, but also ECPs and MAs were effective. Samples of serum collected from immunized and control fish were analysed by immunoblotting against the SDS-PAGE/Western Blotting protein profile of each bacterial fraction. The control and immunized fish sera contained immunoglobulins able to bind aspecifically the proteins having a molecular weight of 23, 48 and 102 kDa respectively. Similar findings were previously reported by Barnes et al., 2002. Moreover the respiratory burst of leukocytes isolated from rainbow trout head kidney was measured by a luminol-based microtitre plate chemiluminescence assay after stimulation with the L. garvieae extracts. The tests were performed using 20 healthy non-immunized fish, by incubating the cells and the stimulants in presence and absence of autologous serum. Preliminary results suggest an evident individual variability in the response and that the release of reactive oxygen species is strongly affected by the serum addiction. This indicates an important role of antibodies and complement in promoting the leukocyte response to different antigens (Barnes et al., 2002). The specific stimulation ability of each fraction (WC, ECPs, MA) will be discussed.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!