
handle: 11390/852992
This paper presents a comparison between building volumes derived from different aerial surveying techniques: laserscanning and photogrammetry. The test regards a sample of 25 buildings, belonging to the Gorizia (Italy) downtown and reconstructed each one from two laser scan datasets (2 p.ts/m2 and 15 p.ts/m2 mean density), from a photogrammetric digital technical map, and from an accurate topographic terrestrial survey. Furthermore, laser datasets allow to compute building volumes either approximately as simple difference between DTM and DEM or more properly as 3D polyhedral models. By inferentially evaluating the mutual differences among volume values using nonparametric statistical tests, most interesting result is that models extracted from scans with 15 p.ts/m2 are significantly equivalent to the real (topographic) ones and complete of the roof part yet.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
