
handle: 11388/364649
This study describes the conceptual structure of Proof of Concept (PoC) research in the fields of innovation and technology management over the past 33 years (1992-2024). Throughout this period, numerous terms and theoretical perspectives have emerged, leading to a fragmented and dispersed field. Utilizing a co-word analysis based on author keywords from the Scopus database, we selected the most frequent terms to provide a comprehensive overview of current studies. Through cluster analysis, we identify and highlight the key labels used by scholars to investigate PoC, illustrating their arrangement into distinct subgroups. Additionally, we interpret the relationships among terms using multidimensional scaling and employ overlay visualization to anchor the relevance of keywords over time. Our findings reveal the coexistence of several conceptualizations within PoC research, ranging from technological advancements to methodological approaches. This study offers a refined conceptual framework, contributing to both theoretical inquiry and practical applications in organizational contexts.
Proof of concept, Co-word analysis, Bibliometric, Keywords, Cluster analysis
Proof of concept, Co-word analysis, Bibliometric, Keywords, Cluster analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
