
handle: 11385/50656 , 11579/33292
In this paper we study the collusion in Knaster’s procedure, starting from the paper of Fragnelli and Marina (2009). First, we introduce a suitable dynamic mechanism, so that the coalition enlargement is always non-disadvantageous. Then, we define a new class of TU-games in order to evaluate the collusion power of the agents.
Fairness, Knaster’s procedure, complete risk aversion, dynamic coalition formation, HB Economic Theory, Fairness; Knaster’s procedure; complete risk aversion; dynamic coalition formation, HG Finance, 330, HF Commerce, jel: jel:C70, jel: jel:C71
Fairness, Knaster’s procedure, complete risk aversion, dynamic coalition formation, HB Economic Theory, Fairness; Knaster’s procedure; complete risk aversion; dynamic coalition formation, HG Finance, 330, HF Commerce, jel: jel:C70, jel: jel:C71
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
