Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11380/1178777
Adam’s Ancestors. Paleoanthropology and Spiritualism in the beginning of 20th century The present article focuses on the scholars who in the first decades of 20th century investigated the origin of Mankind, but they did not admit the value of Darwinian theory and cultivated spiritualistic views. Among them, the central personality was Robert Broom, who discovered in Africa the remains of a large number of Australopithecinae. Broom was convinced of the existence of a Superior Plan in history of nature and that Man was the goal of Evolution. His conception was not far from Bergson’s Évolution créatrice and it was inspired by Alfred R. Wallace’s spiritualistic opinions. Paradoxically, the paleoanthropological results reached by Broom were denied by many colleagues, who had an undeclared timor simiae – that means they dislike and loathed the possibility that Man and Apes had a connected evolution. This attitude convinced many scholars, such as Keith, Osborn, Sollas, Leakey, to believe in the authenticity of the finding of Piltdown Man (1912). About the Piltdown Man, both Wallace and Broom did not join the general enthusiasm. They were right, because in the Fifties the Piltdown Man was demonstrated a gigantic forgery. Today, we know – as Darwin hypothesized – that a few million years ago the African savannah was populated by some species of hominids, and we evolved from one of them.
Ethics, evolutionism, Paleoanthropology, BD143-237, Human evolution, Bergson, Wallace, Broom, Spiritualism, spiritualism, Epistemology. Theory of knowledge, BJ1-1725
Ethics, evolutionism, Paleoanthropology, BD143-237, Human evolution, Bergson, Wallace, Broom, Spiritualism, spiritualism, Epistemology. Theory of knowledge, BJ1-1725
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 40 | |
| downloads | 152 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts