Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ IRIS UNIMORE - Archi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Achievement of the “benchmark” session - on the use of UAV images for 3D reconstruction: a joint experience among users” (held during the 61th SIFET meeting, Lecce, Italy, june 8-10, 2016)

Authors: MANCINI, Francesco; CASTAGNETTI, Cristina; ROSSI, PAOLO; Altri Autori;

Achievement of the “benchmark” session - on the use of UAV images for 3D reconstruction: a joint experience among users” (held during the 61th SIFET meeting, Lecce, Italy, june 8-10, 2016)

Abstract

This paper summarize the achievements of an experimental meeting session held within the 61th SIFET national meeting (Lecce, Italy, 6-10 June 2016). The session named “benchmark” introduced results achieved by users in the processing of a shared dataset, composed of images acquired from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), to reconstruct the three-dimensional properties of cultural heritage. Data, results provided by authors and validation strategies of outcomes from the photogrammetric processing of UAV images highlighted different level of spatial accuracy by the products. Despite the good level of automation introduced by the structure from motion approach to data processing, the users detected differences at cm-level in the accuracy of results after the use of available software. ITA: Il lavoro riassume i risultati ottenuti da diversi partecipanti alla sessione “benchmark” - uso di immagini UAV per la ricostruzione 3D: esperienze condivise tra utenti, svoltasi nell’ambito del 61° convegno nazionale SIFET (Lecce 8-10 giugno 2016). L’iniziativa ha previsto l’elaborazione di un dataset comune, rappresentato da immagini acquisite tramite aeromobile a pilotaggio remoto, ai fini della ricostruzione tridimensionale di ambienti di pregio storico e culturale. Tra gli obiettivi principali vi era quello di confrontare i diversi approcci seguiti dai partecipanti nell’elaborazione dei dati, mettendo in luce le diverse potenzialità dei software disponibili, le possibili strategie relative all’uso dei punti di controllo e il livello di accuratezza raggiunto. Nonostante l’utilizzo di procedure consolidate nell’analisi dei dati, i risultati riportati dagli utenti evidenziano significative differenze nei livelli di accuratezza, verificabili dopo il confronto con i punti di controllo e con la nuvola di punti ottenuta con scansione laser terrestre.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Benchmark session, UAV photogrammetry, camera self-calibration, action camera, frame camera

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 15
    download downloads 39
  • 15
    views
    39
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
15
39
Green