Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ultrasound as an adjuvant treatment for non-specific neck pain

Authors: Dorji, Kinley;

Ultrasound as an adjuvant treatment for non-specific neck pain

Abstract

Rationale: The use of ultrasound as an adjuvant to conservative treatment for neck pain is common, but the evidence of its benefit remains unclear. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of ultrasound as an adjuvant to exercise or/and manual therapy for the improvement of patient-centered outcomes in adults with non-specific neck pain. Methods: Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PEDro and PubMed were searched from date of inception to March 2019 for controlled trials involving ultrasound or phonophoresis as an adjuvant to exercise or/and manual therapy in adults with non-specific neck pain. Review Manager 5.3 was used to calculate mean group differences. Main results: Six studies (361 participants) examining ultrasound or phonophoresis as an adjuvant to exercise or/and manual therapy for sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain were included. The quality of evidence was of very low GRADE. Phonophoresis with capsaicin plus exercise improved pain immediately post-treatment (MD -3.30, 95% CI: -4.05 to -2.55) but not with diclofenac sodium plus exercise as compared to exercise alone. Continuous ultrasound plus exercise improved pain and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) at immediate post-treatment (pain: MD -3.42, 95% CI: -4.08 to -2.7; PPT: MD 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.14 ) and at intermediate - term (pain: MD -2.70 95% CI: -3.62 to -1.78; PPT: MD 0.27 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.51) as compared to exercise alone. Continuous ultrasound or High Power Pain Threshold (HPPT) ultrasound plus manual therapy and exercise showed no benefit for pain reduction (MD -0.75, 95% CI: -2.08 to 0.58), increase in PPT (MD -1.15, 95% CI: -2.55 to 0.25) or improved function/disability (MD -1.05, 95% CI: -4.27 to 2.17) at immediate or short-term as compared to manual therapy and exercise. Conclusion: Based on very low quality evidence, there is insufficient data to support ultrasound or phonophoresis as an adjuvant treatment for non-specific neck pain.

Ultrasound therapy is widely used with exercise or manual therapy for the treatment of neck pain. Yet, its benefits are not clear. This review looked at the benefits of ultrasound added to exercise, manual therapy or both for the treatment of neck pain. The review contains six studies with 361 participants who suffered from neck pain. The results showed very low quality evidence. Applying capsaicin cream with ultrasound or continuous ultrasound in conjunction with exercise had some benefit for improving pain. The same treatment did not improve function as compared to exercise alone. There was no benefit in improving pain or function by adding continuous or high power ultrasound to manual therapy and exercise compared to manual therapy and exercise alone. Due to very low quality evidence, we are uncertain of whether there is a benefit to adding ultrasound to exercise or/and manual therapy for treatment of neck pain.

Master of Science Rehabilitation Science (MSc)

Thesis

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
Keywords

systematic review, ultrasound therapy, non-specific neck pain

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!