
handle: 11368/2892807 , 10077/10545
The paper discusses the Heterogeneity Hypothesis about concepts (Machery, 2009) and the empirical support on which it is based. Two experiments are presented which investigate one of the main predictions of the theory, i.e., the fact that people should be willing to accept apparently contradictory sentences about the same entity
Categorization, Concept, Heterogeneity Hypothesi, Hybrid theory, Concepts; Categorization; Heterogeneity Hypothesis; Hybrid theory; Contextual Framing, Heterogeneity, Hypothesis, Contextual Framing, Concepts
Categorization, Concept, Heterogeneity Hypothesi, Hybrid theory, Concepts; Categorization; Heterogeneity Hypothesis; Hybrid theory; Contextual Framing, Heterogeneity, Hypothesis, Contextual Framing, Concepts
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
