© 2007 Dr. Rohan Bennett ; This research is composed of four broad sections: introduction, background, research and conclusions. The introductory phase describes the research problem and aim. It asserts that property rights, restrictions and responsibilities over land are designed and administered in a disparate, ad hoc and disorganized fashion which makes achieving sustainable development objectives difficult, if not impossible. This thesis aims to develop a framework for organizing the management of property rights, restrictions and responsibilities in a way that enables the achievement of sustainable development objectives by citizens and governments. The background section explores the problem more deeply. First, it looks back to the root causes: a diverse range of drivers including environmentalism, free market economies and social equity are producing legislative and policy sprawl. Second, it looks at the limitations of current attempts to overcome the problem: traditional land administration tools are being bypassed, small ad hoc legal and technical solutions are favoured and only limited holistic approaches exist. Third, the background section investigates the emerging tools being applied to the problem: ontological design, social learning, SDI and spatial technologies, uncertainty theory and new funding models could all profoundly influence the management of land interests. The research section uses the contextual understanding to develop, justify and execute a robust research design. The hypothesis articulates that expanding the existing land administration systems with new tools and principles would enable better management of property rights, restrictions and responsibilities and consequently assist the achievement of sustainable development objectives by citizens and government. A mixed methodology involving both qualitative and quantitative studies is required to test the hypothesis. Additionally, top-down (government) and bottom-up (parcel) perspectives are also used. The sheer size of the ...