
handle: 11343/28948
Spatially enabled societies demand accurate and timely information about land. Australia's land administration systems are state and territory based, administered by independent agencies. These arrangements have served the nation well. However, Australia's increasingly national economic, environmental, and social management priorities challenge their design and capacity. Land management issues now require approaches based on need, not jurisdiction. Information to found sound policymaking at a national level is also essential. Indeed, a national infrastructure for managing land information is an obvious tool needed by governments at all levels: national, state and territory and local. Given Australia's complex federal arrangements, an infrastructure built on existing systems that negates the need for a new national federal agency appears to be the optimal approach. In order to achieve this workable national infrastructure, eight design elements must be developed: a shared vision, a common language or ontology, a governance framework, a business case for change, selection of a data model, an accompanying technical infrastructure, an implementation/maintenance model, and an international compatibility framework. An analysis of the key national drivers and emerging international initiatives is needed to ensure that these elements, and any others that are identified, suit national needs. Extensive future research is required to achieve each of the eight design elements in the context of drivers and global trends.
national infrastructure, land information, spatially enabled society, land administration, ADLIB-ART-4644, ADLIB-ART-4655
national infrastructure, land information, spatially enabled society, land administration, ADLIB-ART-4644, ADLIB-ART-4655
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
