Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Clinical experience with large-core needle biopsies of the breast and evaluation of histopathology].

Authors: N, Fersis; B, Smyczek-Gargya; U, Krainick; G, Mielke; M, Müller-Schimpfle; L, Kiesel; D, Wallwiener;

[Clinical experience with large-core needle biopsies of the breast and evaluation of histopathology].

Abstract

Interventional techniques allow a microinvasive diagnostic of breast lesions. We examined the reliability of large core needle biopsies for histologic diagnosis on breast lesions.143 ultrasound guided automated spring gun biopsies and 16 stereotactic guided vacuum-assisted device biopsies were analyzed. Indications included confirmation of malign or benign lesions and diagnosis of suspicious lesions.In 113 biopsies (71%) an invasive breast carcinoma was diagnosed, in 5 biopsies (3%) in situ/atypical lesions were seen and 38 cases (24%) showed benign lesions. Based on the bioptic results, 108 patients underwent subsequent surgery. An identical histology was seen in 100/108 patients (93%), 5 biopsies were false negative (5%) and 3 specimens yielded necrotic/insufficient material. The immunohistochemical results of percutaneous biopsies and surgical specimens were comparable. 17 out of 113 patients (15%) with biopsy proven carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant therapy. 32/38 patients with benign lesions were follow-up clinically.Ultrasound- or stereotactic guided percutaneous biopsies are methods to confirm histological diagnosis. Based on the biopsy results the, number of surgical excisions can be reduced and treatment of biopsy proven carcinoma can be improved by individual presurgical planing.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diagnosis, Differential, Breast Diseases, Biopsy, Needle, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Breast, Immunohistochemistry, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!