
handle: 11336/75048
The article addresses the argentine political process which results in the emergence of Kirchnerism, and it proposes a historical periodization. the defended argument is that a fraction of the dominant class managed to build hegemony based on a populist-type rupture. More concretely, the big industrial bourgeoisie managed to incorporate into its discourse and political proposal not only the requests of other fractions of the dominant class but also those of the popular classes which allowed to build an active consensus. there are three relevant findings: firstly, the Kirchenist political order was of a hegemonic type, which means domination was organized in a particular way, managing to call active, deliberate consensus of behalf of the popular classes; the second finding is a byproduct of the first: the constitution of new political identities is the result of this specific political order; thirdly, the agent of hegemonic construction was a fraction of the power Block, more concretely, of concentrated industry.
El artículo aborda el proceso político argentino que resulta en la emergencia del kirchnerismo y propone una periodización histórica. Una fracción de la clase dominante logró construir hegemonía a partir de una ruptura de tipo populista. Concretamente, la gran burguesía industrial logró incorporar en su discurso y propuesta de orden político no solo las demandas de otras fracciones de la clase dominante, sino también de las clases populares, lo que le permitió construir un consenso activo. Tres son los hallazgos relevantes: primero, el orden político kirchnerista fue de tipo hegemónico, lo cual significa que organizó de una manera particular la dominación, logrando convocar consenso activo, deliberado, de parte de las clases populares; segundo, derivado del anterior, la constitución de nuevas identidades políticas es el resultado de este orden político específico; tercero, el agente de la construcción hegemónica fue una fracción del Bloque en el poder, concretamente, la industria concentrada.
Fil: Cantamutto, Francisco J.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina. Sociedad de Economía Crítica; Argentina
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6, Bloque de poder, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4, Hegemonía, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2, Populismo, Kirchnerismo, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6, Bloque de poder, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4, Hegemonía, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2, Populismo, Kirchnerismo, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
