
handle: 11336/3675
The aim of this paper is to investigate various limiting results about the concept of validity. In particular, I argue that assuming the absolute generality thesis, the higher-order logic with standard semantics and plural logic cannot be sufficiently expressive to capture its own concept of validity. Moreover, I show that several modifications of classical logic leads to the same results limiting.
Fil: Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, Validity Paradox, Plural Logic, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, Higher-order Languages, Absolute Generality
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, Validity Paradox, Plural Logic, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, Higher-order Languages, Absolute Generality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
