Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ CONICET Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
CONICET Digital
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: CONICET Digital
addClaim

Virtudes y razonamiento judicial: Una perspectiva aretaica sobre la justificación de las decisiones jurídicas

Authors: Serrano, Manuel Francisco;

Virtudes y razonamiento judicial: Una perspectiva aretaica sobre la justificación de las decisiones jurídicas

Abstract

Este trabajo explora la relevancia de la ética de la virtud en el razonamiento judicial. A diferencia de las aproximaciones deontológicas y consecuencialistas, la jurisprudencia de la virtud enfatiza el carácter del juez y sus disposiciones morales como elementos fundamentales para la argumentación judicial. La metodología empleada es crítico-bibliográfica, en tanto los textos son abordados con criterios hermenéuticos de interpretación apelando a herramientas de la argumentación racional. El trabajo se estructura de la siguiente manera: primero se analiza el papel de la prudencia (phrónesis) como virtud epistémica central en la interpretación jurídica; en segundo lugar, se discuten las diversas posturas sobre el rol de las virtudes en la justificación de sentencias; finalmente, se sostiene que la perspectiva aretaica permite una comprensión más rica y matizada de la argumentación judicial al integrar elementos normativos y disposicionales en la toma de decisiones.

This paper explores the relevance of virtue ethics in judicial reasoning. Unlike deontological and consequentialist approaches, virtue jurisprudence emphasizes the judge’s character and moral dispositions as fundamental elements in legal argumentation. It adopts a critical and bibliographic methodology, analyzing texts through hermeneutic interpretation and drawing on tools from rational argumentation. The paper develops in three part. First, it analyzes the role of prudence (phrónesis) as a central epistemic virtue in legal interpretation. Second, it discusses various perspectives on the role of virtues in the justification of judicial decisions. Finally, it argues that the aretaic perspective offers a richer and more nuanced understanding of judicial argumentation by integrating both normative and dispositional elements into decision-making.

Fil: Serrano, Manuel Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias Humanas y Sociales;

Country
Argentina
Keywords

https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, ARETAICO, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, RAZONAMIENTO JUDICIAL, ARGUMENTACIÓN, VIRTUD

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Fields of Science
Fields of Science