
handle: 11336/270873
By 2018 and 2019, three critical approaches emerge that revisit the term Latin Americanism in order to interrogate and reformulate its main hypotheses and tensions. The Latin Americanism of decomposition offers a perspective that deconstructs the frameworks of regional critical tradition; the vernacular Latin Americanisms advocate for a reappraisal of the founding texts of the lineage; and the extraterritorial Latin Americanism captures the impact of migration on the critical imaginary and introduces new inflections into the study of Latin American literature. The analysis of these three approaches reflects dissatisfaction with earlier conceptual frameworks, alongside a renewed engagement with the challenges facing literary criticism in the region as it seeks to reinvent itself in response to contemporary demands. Thus, each of these Latin Americanisms carries out key operations aimed at revisiting a common past. Its examination enables the identification of foundational points of consensus and enduring questions concerning the present condition and prospective developments of Latin American literary criticism.
Hacia 2018 y 2019, se enuncian tres operaciones críticas que vuelven sobre el término latinoamericanismo para indagar y reformular sus principales hipótesis y tensiones. El latinoamericanismo de la descomposición plantea una mirada que deconstruye los dispositivos de la tradición crítica regional; los latinoamericanismos vernáculos apuestan a una revisión de los textos fundadores del linaje; el latinoamericanismo extraterritorial capta el impacto de las migraciones en el imaginario de la crítica y postula nuevas inflexiones para el estudio de las letras latinoamericanas. La indagación de los tres casos permite identificar un malestar sobre conceptualizaciones previas, conjugado con la recuperación de una inquietud central sobre los desafíos de la crítica literaria en la región, que se reinventa y busca responder así a los desafíos contemporáneos. En cada uno de estos latinoamericanismos, entonces, se trazan operaciones cruciales para revisar el pasado en común. Su examen permite identificar acuerdos mínimos e interrogantes abiertos sobre la actualidad y proyección de la crítica literaria latinoamericana.
Fil: Gomez, Facundo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Centro de Historia Intelectual; Argentina
CRÍTICA LITERARIA, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2, LATINOAMERICANISMO, LITERATURA LATINOAMERICANA, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, GIROS TEÓRICOS
CRÍTICA LITERARIA, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2, LATINOAMERICANISMO, LITERATURA LATINOAMERICANA, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, GIROS TEÓRICOS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
