Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ CONICET Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
CONICET Digital
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: CONICET Digital
addClaim

Sentencias en lenguaje claro y personas en condiciones de vulnerabilidad

Authors: Lell, Helga María;

Sentencias en lenguaje claro y personas en condiciones de vulnerabilidad

Abstract

Este trabajo se concentra en un conjunto de sentencias que se califican a sí mismas como comunicadas en lenguaje claro en los años 2018 y 2021 bajo el formato de una misiva. En estas sentencias, los jueces mencionan que realizan la comunicación de conformidad con las Reglas de Brasilia para brindar acceso a la justicia a personas en condiciones de vulnerabilidad. El objetivo es traer a colación reflexiones que muestran que a pesar de la auto-denominación como “claras” estas misivas no responden a los parámetros propios del lenguaje claro ni tampoco se explicita por qué la selección de estrategias comunicativas en relación con una condición de vulnerabilidad de las personas destinatarias aclararía el mensaje. Este artículo se estructura en un apartado sobre lenguaje claro, otro que se refiere a las personas en condiciones de vulnerabilidad en el que se presentan las Reglas de Brasilia y finalmente el abordaje de párrafos que resultan problemáticos por diferentes razones.

This paper focuses on a group of judgments that characterize themselves as written according to plain language under the format of a missive. In these judgments, the judges mention that they communicate in plain language and that they follow the Brasilia Rules in order to provide access to justice to persons in conditions of vulnerability. The aim is to bring up reflections that show that despite the self-designation as "plain" these missives do not respond to the parameters of plain language, nor is it made explicit why the selection of communicative strategies in relation to a condition of vulnerability of the addressees clarifies the message. This paper is structured in three parts: one dedicated to plain language, one to persons in conditions of vulnerability according to Brasilia’s Rules and one to the paragraphs that are examples of problems on plain language uses.

Fil: Lell, Helga María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Confluencia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Jurídicas. Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Jurídicas; Argentina

Country
Argentina
Keywords

https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5, PERSONAS, LENGUAJE CLARO, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, VULNERABILIDAD, SENTENCIAS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green