
handle: 11336/240236
El presente artículo propone colocar en la escena de los debates sobre el Antropoceno-Capitaloceno aportes provenientes de la ecología política latinoamericana y los feminismos territoriales, indígenas y comunitarios, que comparten (y confluyen en) posicionamientos anti-extractivistas. A partir de dicha trama, se recuperan algunas claves epistémico-políticas, al tiempo que invitaciones, que nos desafían a otros modos de habitar, vincularnos y concebir la vida bajo lógicas no-patriarcales y noantropocéntricas. Es posible comprender tales claves, que asumen la relacionalidad como posicionamiento ontológico-político, como desafíos relacionales en un presente en crisis. Para dimensionar la urgencia de entrever futuros otros, se parte del entramado entre capitalismo, colonialidad y patriarcado, como un continuum de violencias, lo que conlleva considerar la ineludible imbricación entre Capitaloceno y extractivismo desde nuestros sures latinoamericanos. Luego, el foco se orienta hacia otra imbricación, la de las luchas feministas y anti-extractivistas. En tanto respuestas críticas y propositivas, en primer lugar, interesa el desafío de repolitizar la vida y reimaginar lo humano a partir de os feminismos territoriales e indígenas, trabajados por Astrid Ulloa desde la ecología política latinoamericana y feminista. En segundo lugar, la propuesta de comprender la vida en clave interdependiente, trabajado por Lorena Mina Navarro, Lucía Linsalata y Raquel Gutiérrez Aguilar desde México.
This article proposes to place on the scene the debates on the AnthropoceneCapitalocene contributions from Latin American political ecology and territorial, indigenous and community feminisms, which share (and converge in) anti-extractivist positions. From this plot, some epistemic-political keys are recovered, as well as invitations, which challenge us to other ways of inhabiting, linking us and conceiving life under non-patriarchal and non-anthropocentric logics. It is possible to understand such keys, which assume relationality as ontological-political positioning, as relational challenges in a crisis present. To measure the urgency of glimpsing future others, we start from the network between capitalism, coloniality and patriarchy, as a continuum of violence, which entails considering the inescapable interweaving between Capitalocene and extractivism from our Latin American souths. Then, the focus is on another imbrication, that of feminist and anti-extractivist struggles. As critical and purposeful responses, in the first place, the challenge of repoliticizing life and reimagining the human from territorial and indigenous feminisms, worked by Astrid Ulloa from the Latin American and feminist political ecology. Secondly, the proposal to understand life in an interdependent key, worked by Lorena Mina Navarro, Lucía Linsalata and Raquel Gutiérrez Aguilar from Mexico.
Fil: Monfrinotti Lescura, Vanessa Ivana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Confluencia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Humanidades. Centro de Estudios y Actualización en Pensamiento Político Decolonialidad e Interculturalidad; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Humanidades. Departamento de Filosofía; Argentina
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5, FEMINISMOS DEL SUR, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, ANTROPOCENO, CAPITALOCENO, EXTRACTIVISMO
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5, FEMINISMOS DEL SUR, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, ANTROPOCENO, CAPITALOCENO, EXTRACTIVISMO
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
