
handle: 11336/215834
Economic inequality is associated with preferences for smaller, immediate gains over larger, delayed ones. Such temporal discounting may feed into rising global inequality, yet it is unclear whether it is a function of choice preferences or norms, or rather the absence of sufficient resources for immediate needs. It is also not clear whether these reflect true differences in choice patterns between income groups. We tested temporal discounting and five intertemporal choice anomalies using local currencies and value standards in 61 countries (N = 13,629). Across a diverse sample, we found consistent, robust rates of choice anomalies. Lower-income groups were not significantly different, but economic inequality and broader financial circumstances were clearly correlated with population choice patterns.
Fil: Navajas Ahumada, Joaquin Mariano. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Aquino, Sibele D.. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil. Laboratory of Research in Social Psychology; Brasil
Fil: Amatya, Kanchan. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Unicef. Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia; Argentina
Fil: Achterberg, Jascha. Mrc Cognition And Brain Sciences Unit; Reino Unido. University of Cambridge; Reino Unido
Fil: Ruggeri, Kai. Columbia University; Estados Unidos. University of Cambridge; Reino Unido
Fil: Bibilouri, Katherine. Sciencespo Paris; Francia. Columbia University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Askelund, Adrian Dahl. University of Oslo; Noruega. Nic Waals Institute; Noruega
Fil: Mejía, Genaro Basulto. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económica; México
Fil: Burghart, Matthias. University Of Konstanz (university Of Konstanz);
DECISION MAKING, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1, TEMPORAL DISCOUNTING, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1, ECONOMY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3, FINANCIAL CHOICES
DECISION MAKING, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1, TEMPORAL DISCOUNTING, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1, ECONOMY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3, FINANCIAL CHOICES
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
