Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao CONICET Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
CONICET Digital
Part of book or chapter of book . 2021
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: CONICET Digital
addClaim

Feminist Economics

Authors: Esquivel, Valeria Renata;

Feminist Economics

Abstract

Feminist economics is a critical and well‐established economics subdiscipline. Over the last 25years, feminist economists have critiqued the gender‐blindness of economic thinking and have developed new analytical frameworks and methodologies to examine gender relations in economic institutions and economic functioning (Floro and Willoughby 2016). The emphasis on gender issues – the concerns about “the persistent and ubiquitous inequalities between men and women that arise from differing social roles and unequal power relations” (Barker and Kuiper 2003, p. 2) – is the distinguishing feature of feminist economics. Feminist economics is at the crossroads of feminism and economics. From feminism, feminist economics inherits its radical political project, namely, denouncing gender inequalities in the distribution of work, incomes, and well‐being – i.e. in the materiality of women’s and men’s lives. From economics, feminist economics inherits the prestige and the object of study, as well as its methodologies and its pretense of objectivity. Economics is not a monolithic science. Mainstream or orthodox economics is defined as the neoclassical paradigm in conceptual terms and the neoliberal paradigm in economic policy. Mainstream economics ultimately asserts the preeminence of market functioning as efficient resource allocator, supported by profit maximizing behavior – or the goodness of human greed (Folbre 2009). Mainstream economics dominates knowledge production, publications, and the access to jobs and promotions at economics departments. In turn, critical approaches under the broad umbrella of heterodox economics comprise a wide range of theoretical traditions, among them Latin American structuralism, post‐Keynesianism, and Marxist economics. In spite of their differences, they all present alternatives to mainstream economics that lead to different policy prescriptions, particularly at the macroeconomic level.

Fil: Esquivel, Valeria Renata. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina

Country
Argentina
Keywords

FEMINIST ECONOMICS, DEVELOPMENT, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, GENDER, ECONOMIC THINKING

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!