
handle: 11336/196457
Desde su origen en el siglo V a.C., la democracia como régimen político ha mantenido cierto núcleo normativo constante, la igualdad y la libertad entre sus miembros, y fuertes discontinuidades en la organización interna de sus instituciones. Las democracias modernas son igualmente deudoras de dos tradiciones: por un lado la de la soberanía popular, sea bajo la forma de una democracia directa o bajo la forma de una constitución mixta republicana; y, por otro lado, la de los derechos subjetivos innatos. La democracia resolvió los dilemas que le presentaban los intereses contrapuestos por medio de dos recursos: el de la representación –que permitía incorporarlos en un cuerpo colegiado reducido dentro del cual era posible la deliberación y el acuerdo– y el de la elección universal de los representantes y mandatarios por períodos acotados. Este esquema institucional amenaza quebrarse bajo la tensión insostenible de las exigencias domésticas de cada nación, por una parte, y las potentes constricciones provenientes de una economía globalizada, por la otra.
From its very beginning during the fifth century B.C. democracy, as a political regime, has maintained a constant normative nucleus; equality and freedom among its members. But it also presents notorious discontinuities in the institutional internal organization. Modern democracies are equally indebted to two traditions; on the one hand popular sovereignty, under the form of either direct democracy or republican mixed constitution, and innate subjective rights on the other. Democracy resolved the dilemmas that emerged from opposed interests through two ways: representation, which enables it to incorporate them in a reduced collegiate body, within which deliberation and consensus is possible, and also through the universal election of representatives and governors by preestablished periods of time. This institutional schema is dangerously falling apart due to domestic tensions within each nation, on the one hand, and the constriction coming from the globalized economy on the other.
Fil: Guariglia, Osvaldo Norberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Democracia, derechos, representation, constitución mixta, representación, sovereignty, Democracy, soberanía, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, globalización financiera, rights, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, mixed constitution, DEMOCRACIA, GLOBALIZACIÓN, JUSTICIA, INTERNACIONALISMO, finance globalization
Democracia, derechos, representation, constitución mixta, representación, sovereignty, Democracy, soberanía, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, globalización financiera, rights, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, mixed constitution, DEMOCRACIA, GLOBALIZACIÓN, JUSTICIA, INTERNACIONALISMO, finance globalization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
