
handle: 11336/177834
To investigate the discursive communities and the scopic regimes involved in the so-called “repression files” implies dealing with cross-discipline approaches on Visual studies and Discourse analysis. What is there behind the presumption of “dangerousness” leading to the seizure of photographs by police forces? The knot woven out of images and control stages different visual fields in dispute: primarily, an order framed by a stark gaze cast by surveillance forces on the seized photographs. In spite of its hegemony, however, every reality comprises at least two sides: the reverse of this worldview which deems itself impartial, its visual countershot, is dominated by the bodily disposition of the actors portrayed. Finally, delving into the images archived by repressive organizations also reveals an unfathomable off-screen space, which expands beyond the recorded frames.
Fil: Kratje, Julia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5, ARCHIVO, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, IMAGEN, GÉNERO
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5, ARCHIVO, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, IMAGEN, GÉNERO
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
