Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao CONICET Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
CONICET Digital
Conference object . 2021
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: CONICET Digital
addClaim

How effective are plant bioestimulants to alleviate drought stress in grapevine?

Authors: Benyahia, Fadwa; Giovanelli, Francesco; Gonzalez, Carina Veronica; Andreotti, Carlo;

How effective are plant bioestimulants to alleviate drought stress in grapevine?

Abstract

There is currently an increasing demand for innovative agronomic tools able to enhance crop resilience against environmental stresses caused by climate change. Even though plant biostimulants (PBs) have been found able to increase water stress tolerance of several crops under different growing conditions, research on the use of these natural compounds in viticulture is still incomplete and results are often inconsistent. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the ability of different commercial PBs to mitigate the adverse effects of water limitation in grapevine. PBs, including arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), protein-hydrolysate (PH), seaweed extracts (SEA) and silicon (SI) were tested on potted cv. Sauvignon Blanc grown in controlled conditions under two water regimes: well-watered (WW) and water-stress (WS). Vine growth performances, during and after the drought period, as affected by the different PBs applications were monitored at daily basis by measuring several physiological and biometric parameters. During WS, AMF and SEA-treated plants showed a slower decreased (-0.2 MPa, corresponding to 36% less) than the untreated WS plants. Moreover, the PBs pre-stress application accelerated the leaf gas exchange recovery to WW values. Upon rewatering, SI-WS-treated plants showed increments of leaf gas exchanges rates that were around 30% higher than those of the control-WS vines. As for the seasonal biomass accumulation, it resulted lower in WS-vines, independenlty of the PBs. Overall, the application of selected PBs before the water stress allow to slow down the the buildup of the drought stress in grapevine, therefore enhancing the possibility for the crop to overcome the negative physiological consequences of periods of water scarcity. Further evidence of PBs effectiveness are nevertheless needed especially under vineryard (open field) conditions.

Fil: Gonzalez, Carina Veronica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina

Fil: Giovanelli, Francesco. University Of Bolzano. Faculty Of Science And Technology; Italia

Fil: Andreotti, Carlo. University Of Bolzano. Faculty Of Science And Technology; Italia

Fil: Benyahia, Fadwa. University Of Bolzano. Faculty Of Science And Technology; Italia

XI International Symposium on Grapevine Physiology and Biotechnology

International Society for Horticultural Science

Stellenbosch

Sudáfrica

Country
Argentina
Keywords

DROUGHT TOLERANCE, ARBUSCULAR-MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI, PROTEIN HYDROLISATES, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1, GRAPEVINE PHYSIOLOGY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4, SILICON, SEAWEED EXTRACTS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!