Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao CONICET Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
CONICET Digital
Part of book or chapter of book . 2019
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: CONICET Digital
addClaim

Characteristics and Applications of Bacterial Nanocellulose

Authors: Califano, Alicia Noemi; Balquinta, María Laura; Cerrutti, Patricia; Andres, Silvina Cecilia; Lorenzo, Gabriel;

Characteristics and Applications of Bacterial Nanocellulose

Abstract

There is an increasing demand for products made from renewable and sustainable non-petroleum based resources. Cellulose, the most abundant polymer on Earth, is renewable, biodegradable, as well as non-toxic. In nature, cellulose is a ubiquitous structural polymer that confers its mechanical properties to higher plant cells. Cellulose is a linear polymer of ß-(1-4)-D-glucopyranose units in 4C1 conformation. Therefore the repeating unit of the cellulose polymer is known to comprise two anhydroglucose rings joined via a ß-(1?4) glycosidic linkage (called cellobiose). The two end-groups of this polymer are not chemically equivalent, since one bears the ?normal? C ?OH group (non-reducing end), whereas the other has a C1?OH moiety in equilibrium with the corresponding aldehyde function (reducing end). It is a very common component of all vegetables, as well as some algae and a few molds. Plants are the main source in combination with hemicellulose and ligning, as a ternary complex present in any cell wall. In addition, there are some strains of the prokaryotic, nonphotosynthetic organisms, which have the ability to synthesize high-quality cellulose organized as twisting ribbons of microfibril bundles. The number of the glucose units or the degree of polymerization (DP) is influenced by the origin and treatment of the raw material.Cellulose is an insoluble molecule consisting of between 2000 - 14000 residues. It forms crystals (cellulose I) where intra-molecular (O3-H?O5´ and O6?H-O2´) and intra-strand (O6-H?O3´) hydrogen bonds holds the network flat allowing the more hydrophobic ribbon faces to stack. Each residue is oriented 180° to the next with the chain synthesized two residues at a time. Although individual strands of cellulose are intrinsically no less hydrophilic, or no more hydrophobic, than some other soluble polysaccharides (such as amylose) this tendency to form crystals utilizing extensive intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonding makes it completely insoluble in normal aqueous solutions (although it is soluble in more exotic solvents such as N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMNO) or LiCl/N,N´-dimethylacetamide). Water molecules are considered the responsible of catalyze the formation of the natural cellulose crystals by aligning the chains through hydrogen-bonded bridging.Part of a cellulose preparation is amorphous between these crystalline sections. The overall structure is of aggregated particles with extensive pores capable of holding relatively large amounts of water by capillarity. The natural crystal is made up from metastable cellulose I with all the cellulose strands parallel. This cellulose I can be divided into two coexisting phases: cellulose Ia and cellulose Iß, with differing displacements of the chains relative to one another. If it can be recrystallized (e.g. from base or CS2) it gives the thermodynamically more stable cellulose II structure with an antiparallel arrangement of the strands and some intra-sheet hydrogen-bonding.Due to its hierarchical structure and semi crystalline nature, nanoparticles can be extracted from this natural polymer using a top-down mechanically or chemically induced deconstructing strategy or a bottom-up production of cellulose nanofibrils from glucose by bacteria. Cellulosic materials with one dimension in the nanometer range, such as whiskers, microfibrillated cellulose, nanofibrillated cellulose and cellulose nanofibrils or microfibrils are referred to generically as nanocelluloses. These materials combine important cellulose properties such as broad chemical-modification capacity, hydrophilicity, and the formation of versatile semi crystalline fiber morphologies. Nanocelluloses may be classified in three main subcategories: microfibrillated cellulose (MFC, delamination of wood pulp by mechanical pressure before and/or after chemical or enzymatic treatment, 5-60 nm diameter, several micrometers length), nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC, acid hydrolysis of cellulose from many sources, 5-70 nm diameter, 100-250 nm length), and bacterial nanocellulose (BNC, bacterial synthesis, 20-100 nm diameter). While the diameters of NCC and BNC are similar, the main difference between the two types of nanocellulose is their purity and crystal structure. BNC is essentially pure cellulose and NCC is usually a composite itself consisting of both celulose and hemicellulose.

Fil: Andres, Silvina Cecilia. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos; Argentina

Fil: Califano, Alicia Noemi. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos; Argentina

Fil: Balquinta, María Laura. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos; Argentina

Fil: Lorenzo, Gabriel. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos; Argentina

Fil: Cerrutti, Patricia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnología en Polímeros y Nanotecnología. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnología en Polímeros y Nanotecnología; Argentina

Country
Argentina
Keywords

STRUCTURE, FTIR, BACTERIAL NANOCELLULOSE, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.5, X RAY DIFFRACTION, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!