
A large, integrated health system in St. Louis acquired a primary care, health maintenance organization staff model group practice with 55 physicians. Health system leadership positioned the acquired physician group to diversify and expand its fee-for-service patient base to increase revenue and support the expansive fixed cost structure of the health centers. With interim managers, the leaders developed a new physician compensation plan that put a greater portion of the physicians' compensation at risk and provided incentives for enhanced productivity in both the capitated and fee-for-service lines of business. This article explores the key characteristics, benefits and potential areas for improvement associated with the new incentive compensation model and describes the centers' improved operating performance and gains in physician productivity.
Physician Incentive Plans, Group Practice, Prepaid, Missouri, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, Utilization Review, Fee-for-Service Plans, Efficiency, Capitation Fee, Referral and Consultation, Reimbursement, Incentive
Physician Incentive Plans, Group Practice, Prepaid, Missouri, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, Utilization Review, Fee-for-Service Plans, Efficiency, Capitation Fee, Referral and Consultation, Reimbursement, Incentive
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
