
handle: 11285/641050
Bird vocalizations have been the focus of a wide variety of interdisciplinary studies in bioacoustics and neuroethology since they serve as models of motor control, learning and auditory perception. Yet, researchers have only begun to shed light on the structure and function of birdsong. Hypotheses abound, but still there is little agreement as how songs should be analyzed. One of the main challenges has been to classify acoustic units (syllables) from birdsong recordings, a task requiring robust classification algorithms capable of generalizing to unseen instances and dealing with data scarcity. Systematically detecting changes in syllable repertoires can help biologists to understand the origin and evolution of birdsong. The process of learning good features to discriminate among numerous and different sound classes is computationally expensive. Moreover, it might be impossible to achieve acceptable performance in cases where training data is scarce and classes are unbalanced. To address this issue, we propose a few-shot learning task in which an algorithm must make predictions given only a few instances of each class. We compared the performance of different Siamese Neural Networks at metric learning over the set of Cassini’s Vireo syllables. Then, the network features were reused for the few-shot classification task. With this approach we overcame the limitations of data scarcity and class imbalance while achieving state-of-the-art performance.
Maestro en Ciencias Computacionales
Machine Learning, Technology, Deep Learning, Siamese Neural Network, Signal Processing, INGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA::CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS::TECNOLOGÍA DE LOS ORDENADORES::LENGUAJES ALGORÍTMICOS, Few-Shot Learning, Birdsong, Bioacoustics
Machine Learning, Technology, Deep Learning, Siamese Neural Network, Signal Processing, INGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA::CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS::TECNOLOGÍA DE LOS ORDENADORES::LENGUAJES ALGORÍTMICOS, Few-Shot Learning, Birdsong, Bioacoustics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
