Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ UiS Bragearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UiS Brage
Bachelor thesis . 2025
Data sources: UiS Brage
addClaim

Methodology for Assesment of Drilling Fluid Additives for Drilling of Depleted Reservoirs Using Barite-Weighted Oil-Based Drilling Fluid and Testing with Backflow Through Production Screens

Authors: Sandved-Klungtvedt, Brage;

Methodology for Assesment of Drilling Fluid Additives for Drilling of Depleted Reservoirs Using Barite-Weighted Oil-Based Drilling Fluid and Testing with Backflow Through Production Screens

Abstract

Drilling through depleted reservoirs presents significant operational challenges due to potentially reduced formation pressure, increased risk of lost circulation, and potential wellbore instability. These issues create further complexities when drilling across reservoir sections where formation damage and production impairments must be minimized. The research investigates a methodology for evaluating and optimizing drilling fluid additives for depleted sandstone reservoirs, using barite-weighted oil-based mud by performing high-pressure fluid loss tests with backflow analysis through production screens. A primary focus is placed on the selection and evaluation of wellbore strengthening materials and lost circulation materials, targeting sealing of matrix permeability up to 40 µm and fractures in the 500 – 600 µm range, under high differential pressures. Key considerations include the particle size distribution, particle mechanical strength, filter cake formation and removability, and the ability to maintain backflow through 230 µm production screens, which is critical for a successful completion and production phase. In anticipation of increased reservoir depletion, which may lead to the development of higher differential pressures and larger induced fractures, additional formulations were prepared by incorporating coarser wellbore strengthening materials with particle sizes approaching the target fracture widths of 1500 – 2500 µm. Results show that: •An improved fluid formulation, with bimodal particle size distribution, successfully achieved the design criteria of low fluid loss and reduced formation damage, unimpeded backflow through production screens and effective sealing of 500 µm sotted discs. •Enhanced sealing performance on wider fractures was most effectively achieved by introducing coarser bridging materials with a D90 approaching fracture width, rather than merely increasing the concentration of existing materials. This strategy enabled more stable seals and reduced fluid loss at high differential pressures. •Fluids with an insufficient content of fine bridging materials failed to establish stable seals, even when coarse particles closely matched fracture widths and created a particle bridge.

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities