Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Strategies That Affect Individuals’ Gender-Fair Language Use

Authors: Kuhn, Elisabeth Angela;

Strategies That Affect Individuals’ Gender-Fair Language Use

Abstract

Language reproduces and produces gender and reality, hence plays a significant role in pursuing an equitable society without discrimination based on gender categories. The promotion of gender-fair language through feminization and neutralization strategies has led to an increase in the use of gender-fair language in recent decades. The change strongly affected formal texts yet only partially influenced everyday language use. In order to further encourage gender-fair language use, it is crucial to better understand what affects individuals’ gender-fair language use. Gender-fair language use is the result of a complex language production process that must be understood in a social context. Accordingly, this thesis was based on written language production and employed both a social-cognitive (motivation and opportunity as determinants model) and a social-interaction perspective (communication accommodation theory) to identify relevant factors that on the one hand could explain individuals’ current gender-fair language use and on the other hand how individuals can change and adapt toward more gender-fair language use. Concerning deliberate language use, language competence, the ability to use gender-fair language, and motivation to use accurate language were identified as relevant elements. Regarding automated processes implicit and explicit exposure to gender-fair language and the prevalence of word forms were investigated. Six experiments (four in German; two in Norwegian) were conducted. To operationalize key concepts new materials and scales needed to be developed, such as text materials in gender-fair and gender-biased forms. Experiments were conducted with samples of university students and trainees and either paper-and-pencil or online. Results did not support a relation between gender-fair language use and general language competence or motivation to use accurate language. Explicit instruction increased individuals’ gender-fair language use but did not result in exclusive use of gender-fair language. Implicit exposure to gender-fair language (reading) leads in the Norwegian samples and in the female German samples to an increase in gender-fair language use. Explicit exposure (being made aware that a text is formulated in a genderfair manner) leads in the male German sample to an increased use of gender-fair language. With reference to word forms, participants tended to select the more prevalent form. In sum, the findings of the present study suggest amongst the investigated strategies to promote gender-fair language the most effectives are giving instructions and exposing people to—and making them aware of—gender-fair language. These approaches can create a cascade effect, those who use gender-fair language expose other people to its use, which in turn can lead to them using gender-fair language, again exposing others. As gender-fair forms become more prevalent, individuals can access them more easily and, as such, are more likely to use them.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green