
handle: 11250/2688689
This study analyzes the difference between classical RFM models and Machine Leaning (ML) models when calculating CLV with transactional data. In this paper we run different programs to analyze the CLV value by using both methods. Based on the results, the researchers found out that Pareto/NBD model have better predictive power of performing CLV predictions than ML models. Lastly, the findings proved the effectiveness of the Pareto/NBD method of calculating CLV.
Masteroppgave(MSc) in Master of Science in Business Analytics - Handelshøyskolen BI, 2020
business analytics
business analytics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
