Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
BI Open
Master thesis . 2018
Data sources: BI Open
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Do Family-Owned Firms Perform Better than Non-Family-Owned Firms?

Authors: Pedersen-Bjergaard, Anders; Dalby, Håvard Mostervik;

Do Family-Owned Firms Perform Better than Non-Family-Owned Firms?

Abstract

This thesis examines the performance of family-owned and non-family-owned firms in Norway from 2000-2015. The performance differences are compared using return on assets (ROA) as the indicator of firm performance. The thesis also takes a closer look at performance in family and non-family firms within five different industries: Retail, shipping, architecture, financial services and IT. The research is mainly based on OLS panel regression, where the analysis is divided into four models. To verify the data robustness of the results from the main specification, two additional robustness checks using the generalized method of moments (GMM) and panel OLS controlling for industry specific effects are performed. On average, family-owned companies tend to perform better than non-familyowned companies. From the four regression models representing the main specification, the results show that family ownership does not affect firm performance for the population as a whole. The robustness check incorporating GMM also confirms this. The results suggest that the family-owned companies tend to perform better because they have smaller boards and a higher degree of inside power, rather than the family ownership itself. Unlike previous research, this thesis also looks at differences within industries. The results presented find that family ownership has a positive, significant effect on firm performance within the architectural industry. For companies within shipping, this relationship is the opposite, and family ownership is shown to have a significant, adverse effect on firm performance. This contradicts what we found when analysing the population as a whole. Indeed, our results indicate that the effect of family ownership on firm performance relies on the industry which the firm is located within. The results presented also suggests that the reason for these results may be due to different industries being exposed inversely to agency conflicts. Compared to previous studies done on family firms in Norway, this thesis neither rejects nor confirms previous research and is best seen as complementary.

Masteroppgave(MSc) in Master of Science in Business, Finance - Handelshøyskolen BI, 2018

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

finans, finance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green