Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ HVL Openarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
HVL Open
Article . 2012
Data sources: HVL Open
addClaim

Psykisk helsearbeid: konfeksjon eller skreddersøm?

Authors: Kinn, Liv Grethe; Ekeland, Tor-Johan; Byrkjeflot, Haldor;

Psykisk helsearbeid: konfeksjon eller skreddersøm?

Abstract

Psykisk helsearbeid skal være lokalbasert, samkjørt, brukerorientert, og basert på beste praksis. Målet med dette essayet er å utforske hvordan psykiske helsearbeidere forholder seg til myndighetenes krav om effektiv, standardisert og riktig behandling, og praksisfeltets antatte normer om individualisert og god behandling. Etter som behandlingslinjer, kliniske retningslinjer og veiledere representerer verktøy for beste praksis, benevnes disse som evidens oppskrifter. Konklusjon: Psykiske helsearbeidere velger oftere fagideologiske begrunnelser fremfor forskningsbaserte, de er positive til brukermedvirkning, men har problemer med å omsette dette til handling, og de vegrer seg mot å anvende evidensoppskrifter. For å opprettholde sin posisjon må den psykiske helsearbeideren gå en balansegang mellom skreddersøm og konfeksjon av tjenesteproduksjon.

Artikkel i tidsskriftet "Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning"

Country
Norway
Keywords

brukermedvirkning, evidensoppskrifter, psykisk helsearbeid, beste praksis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green