Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Sammenlignende laboratorieprøvinger (SLP): Analyse av ferskvann. SLP 16-25

Authors: Bryntesen, Tina;

Sammenlignende laboratorieprøvinger (SLP): Analyse av ferskvann. SLP 16-25

Abstract

The 25th Norwegian intercomparison study for analysis of fresh water, designated 16-25, was organized in October-November 2016 with 50 participants. It comprised analysis of three sample sets of four samples (A-D, E-H, I-L), and two sample sets of two samples (M-N and O-P), made by adding known amounts of stoichiometric material to water from Preståsen lake in Aurskog-Høland municipality, which had been filtered through membrane filter with pore size 0,45 μm. The program included 32 different parameters: pH, conductivity, turbidity, colour, UV-absorption, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, hardness, alkalinity, chloride, sulfate, fluoride, total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand (CODMn), phosphate, total phosphorus, ammonium, nitrate, total nitrogen, aluminium, lead, iron, cadmium, copper, chromium, manganese, nickel, zinc, antimony and arsenic. The analysis was largely carried out according to Norwegian standards or equivalent methods (Table B1). The median of the participants' results, after outlie have been omitted, is selected as the "true" value. The acceptance limit is normally set to ± 20 % of the average true value for the two samples that form a pair. The results are presented graphically in a Youden diagram, where a circle with the acceptance limit as radius is drawn. The result pairs within the circle are affected by a total error less than the limit and are hence considered acceptable (Appendix A). In total 86 % of participants' results were acceptable, a number which is somewhat higher than for the previous intercomparison studies (Table 1).

Under en sammenliknende laboratorieprøving (SLP) gjennomført i oktober-november 2016 bestemte 50 laboratorier pH, konduktivitet, turbiditet, farge, UV-absorpsjon, natrium, kalium, kalsium, magnesium, hardhet, alkalitet, klorid, sulfat, fluorid, totalt organisk karbon, kjemisk oksygenforbruk (CODMn), fosfat, totalfosfor, ammonium, nitrat, totalnitrogen, aluminium, bly, jern, kadmium, kobber, krom, mangan, nikkel, sink, antimon og arsen i vann. Prøvene ble laget ved å tilsette kjente stoffmengder til vann fra Preståsen tjern i Aurskog-Høland kommune. Vannet var på forhånd filtrert gjennom membranfilter med porevidde 0,45 μm. Totalt ble 86 % av resultatene vurdert som akseptable, en andel som er noe høyere enn det foregående år, og litt over det gjennomsnittlige nivået for disse SLPene. Best resultater viser totalfosfor og totalnitrogen, med 100 % akseptable resultater. De svakeste resultater ble observert for ammonium, fluorid, CODMn og sink, der alle hadde mindre enn 70 % akseptable resultater. En del av parameterne opptrådte dessuten i lave konsentrasjoner og laboratoriene må ta hensyn til usikkerheten i "sann verdi" ved evalueringen av sine resultater. Det er stor variasjon i analysekvaliteten mellom laboratoriene, og de som har avvikende resultater bør snarest vurdere disse resultater opp mot egne oppgitte analyseusikkerheter for de aktuelle analysene, og deretter eventuelt igangsette tiltak for å forbedre kvaliteten på bestemmelsene.

NIVA

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

Prestasjonsprøving, Interlaboratory comparison, Ferskvannsanalyse, Akkreditering, VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400, SLP, Freshwater analysis, Proficiency testing, Accreditation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green