Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
SINTEF Open
Report . 2005
Data sources: SINTEF Open
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Aktivitetsdata - psykisk helsevern for voksne. Årsdata 2004

Authors: Rudjord, Ketil; Nybrodahl, Inger;

Aktivitetsdata - psykisk helsevern for voksne. Årsdata 2004

Abstract

Denne rapporten utgis av SINTEF Helse Norsk pasientregister. Formålet med rapporten er å rette søkelyset mot datakvaliteten på aktivitetsdata for psykisk helsevern for voksne samt å presentere noen utvalgte aktivitetstall for driftsåret 2004.Alle helseforetak rapporterte data for 2004. Kun to institusjoner direkte underlagt regionale helseforetak klarte ikke å rapportere data. Bare 11 av 32 rapporteringsenheter leverte både gammelt og nytt format som foreskrevet. På rapporteringstidspunktet var to rapporteringsenheter godkjent for leveranse på XML.24 av 109 døgnenheter hadde utilfredsstillende kvalitet på de rapporterte aktivitetsdata. Det er noe forbedring når det gjelder koding av hoveddiagnose, andelen av opphold hvor det ikke er kodet hoveddiagnose har gått ned. Det er videre en svak forbedring når det gjelder koding av spesialistvedtak og tilleggskriterier, mens dette ikke gjelder for henvisningstype. Det er en større andel av oppholdene hvor det ikke er kodet henvisningstype.Sammenlignet med 2003 har antall utskrivinger i de sammenlignbare tall gått opp med 5 prosent, antall oppholdsdøgn gått noe ned og gjennomsnittlig liggetid har gått ned.

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green