
handle: 11250/2442651
The following paper uses a dataset free of survivorship bias for the period 2002-2011. We investigate whether Norwegian mutual funds possess enough skills to outperform a passive benchmark based on Fama and French’s five-factor model. Our results suggest that the mutual fund industry exhibits significant excess returns on a 10% level in the recent financial crisis. Further, we examine whether the results obtained by the five-factor model are greater than the results obtained by the three-factor model. Our findings indicate that the five-factor model is better to explain the volatility in returns compared to previous models. Moreover, we do not find any evidence of performance persistence among Norwegian mutual funds. The bootstrapping results indicate significant inferior performance in the whole sample and the pre-crisis period. However, we do find evidence of managerial skills for the two best performing funds in the crisis period.
Masteroppgave(MSc) in Master of Science in Finance - Handelshøyskolen BI, 2016
finans, financial economics, finance
finans, financial economics, finance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
