Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Sammenlignende laboratorieprøvninger (SLP) - analyse av ferskvann - SLP 08-17

Authors: Hovind, H.;

Sammenlignende laboratorieprøvninger (SLP) - analyse av ferskvann - SLP 08-17

Abstract

Under en sammenlignende laboratorieprøvning gjennomført i februar – april 2008 bestemte 60 av 68 påmeldte laboratorier pH, konduktivitet, turbiditet, farge, UV-absorpsjon, natrium, kalium, kalsium, magnesium, hardhet, alkalitet, klorid, sulfat, fluorid, totalt organisk karbon, kjemisk oksygenforbruk (CODMn), fosfat, totalfosfor, ammonium, nitrat, totalnitrogen, aluminium, bly, jern, kadmium, kobber, krom, mangan, nikkel og sink i vann. Prøvene ble laget ved å tilsette kjente stoffmengder til naturlig innsjøvann etter at dette var filtrert gjennom membranfilter med porevidde 0,45 µm. Totalt ble 76 % av resultatene vurdert som akseptable, en andel som er sammenlignbar med de foregående slp’er. Best resultater viser jern, med andel akseptable resultater på 94 %. De svakeste resultatene ble observert for fluorid, alkalitet og sink med henholdsvis 46, 51 og 54 % akseptable resultater. Det er stor variasjon i analysekvaliteten hos enkelte laboratorier, og de som har avvikende resultater må snarest igangsette tiltak for å forbedre kvaliteten på bestemmelsene.

Årsliste 2008

NIVA,

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

prestasjonsprøving, interlaboratory comparison, proficiency testing, akkreditering, freshwater analysis, kjemi, ferskvannsanalyser, sammenlignende laboratorieprøvning, VDP::Matematikk og naturvitenskap: 400, accreditation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green