
handle: 11250/162950
A horizontal merger is unlikely to be profitable unless it involves the large majority of firms in an industry. This well established result was developed by Salant et al (1983) in a closed economy setting. The present paper studies the profitability of mergers in an open economy. A cross-border merger provides the acquiring firm with market access. If alternative modes of market entry are sufficiently costly, a merger may indeed be profitable. The relationship between entry costs and the profitability of merger is, however, not a monotonic one. An increase in entry costs may cause a change in the optimal entry mode of rival firms such that a merger may be unprofitable even for higher entry costs. The paper also derives results regarding the nationality of the acquiring firm.
foreign direct investment, trade, mergers and acquisitions
foreign direct investment, trade, mergers and acquisitions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
