
This thesis investigates interpretability of machine learning models from a holistic standpoint by combining optimization-based XAI methods with evaluation grounded in user studies. We propose optimization-based methods to generate rule sets for binary and multi-class classification as well as to generate (robust) counterfactual explanations for common machine learning models. In addition, we discuss the implications of XAI in practical settings like healthcare and conduct user studies with potential end users and domain experts. In doing so, we approach the field of interpretable machine learning from a distinctive angle and incorporate insights from the social sciences in research and development of XAI methods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
