
handle: 11245/1.430598
Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) pioneering work claimed that human beings think metaphorically, thereby initiating a remarkable revival of the scholarly interest in this queen of tropes. This interest reigned at first primarily among linguists. Since then, however, metaphor research has considerably broadened beyond the investigation of its verbal manifestations. Varieties involving visuals, specifically, are attracting much attention. This chapter sketches dimensions of metaphor pertaining to the medium of film. After a short historical positioning of cinematic metaphor within the wider field, key terms (target, source, mapping) are defined and explained. Central issues pertaining to metaphor in film (mode, creativity, embodiment, genre, diegetic versus nondiegetic source domain) are addressed, providing film scholars with tools for analysis. The discussions are enlightened by some examples.
791, 700
791, 700
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
