
handle: 11245/1.205496 , 10419/85839
This paper presents an empirical analysis of the importance of 'comparison income' for individual well-being or happiness. In other words, the influence of the income of a reference group on individual well-being is examined. The main novelty is that various hypotheses are tested: importance of own income, relevance of the income of the reference group and of the distance between own income and the income of the reference group, and asymmetry of comparisons, i.e. the comparison income effect differing between richer and poor individuals. The analysis uses a self-reported measure of satisfaction with life as a measure of individual well-being. The data come from a large German panel known as GSOEP. The study concludes that the income of the reference group is about as important as own income for individual happiness, that individuals are happier the larger their income is in comparison with the income of the reference group, and that for some populations this comparison effect is asymmetric.
Relative Utility, Comparison Income; Interdependence of Preferences; Reference Group; Relative Utility; Subjective Well-Being, Subjective Well-Being, ddc:330, Comparison Income, Einkommensverteilung, Varianzanalyse, I31, Deutschland, Reference Group, Interdependence of Preferences, Lebensqualität, Schätzung, jel: jel:I31
Relative Utility, Comparison Income; Interdependence of Preferences; Reference Group; Relative Utility; Subjective Well-Being, Subjective Well-Being, ddc:330, Comparison Income, Einkommensverteilung, Varianzanalyse, I31, Deutschland, Reference Group, Interdependence of Preferences, Lebensqualität, Schätzung, jel: jel:I31
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
