
handle: 11245/1.135983
Summary: Standard deontic logic features fairly serious so-called ``paradoxes'' (technically: counterintuitive validities). Much energy in deontic logic has been spent on avoiding these ``paradoxes''. We suggest a reformulation of deontic logic in terms of a multi-agent logic, ALX.3, where a ``super-agent'' (think of a legislature) lays down the law of the land and other agents have to follow its rules. In particular, obligations are reformulated in terms of ``preferences'' of the superagent. We can show that our approach avoids the classical ``paradoxes'' of deontic logic, thanks to the properties of the preference operator of ALX.3.
deontic logic, preference operator, paradoxes, multi-agent logic, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), counterintuitive validities, 004, obligations
deontic logic, preference operator, paradoxes, multi-agent logic, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), counterintuitive validities, 004, obligations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
