Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Efficacy of modified ultrafiltration in reoperation for valvular disease].

Authors: M, Kamada; K, Niibori; H, Akimoto; H, Yokoyama; M, Tofukuji; A, Iguchi; M, Ohmi; +3 Authors

[Efficacy of modified ultrafiltration in reoperation for valvular disease].

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of modified ultrafiltration (MUF) in reoperation for valvular disease. Fourteen patients were divide into two groups consisting of a control group (n = 6) and a MUF group (n = 8). MUF was carried out for fifteen minutes immediately after the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass. The blood flow through the ultrafilter was 300 ml/min and about 1,200 ml of water was removed. The hematocrit elevated significantly from 25% to 31% in the MUF group (p < 0.05). The percentage of the increase in body weight after the operation in the MUF group was significantly less than that in the control group (3.3 +/- 3.1% vs 8.3 +/- 4.3%, p < 0.05). The PaO2/FIO2 after the operation in the MUF group was significantly higher than that in the control group (376 +/- 125 mmHg vs 242 +/- 79 mmHg, p < 0.05). The duration of mechanical ventilation in the MUF group was significantly less than that in the control group (1.1 +/- 1.1 days vs 5.3 +/- 3.3 days, p < 0.05). In conclusion, MUF is useful to hemoconcentrate, reduce postoperative body weight gain and promote early recovery of pulmonary function in reoperation for valvular disease.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Reoperation, Heart Valve Diseases, Ultrafiltration, Middle Aged, Aortic Valve, Humans, Mitral Valve, Female, Tricuspid Valve, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!