Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Air endotamponade in 52 vitrectomies due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy--retrospective comparison with 40 vitrectomies without endotamponade].

Authors: S, Schulze; S, Schulze; J, Schmidt; P, Kroll;

[Air endotamponade in 52 vitrectomies due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy--retrospective comparison with 40 vitrectomies without endotamponade].

Abstract

In patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy rebleeding after pars plana vitrectomy is one of the most common complications. We tried to reduce the rate of that complication by using an air endotamponade.The following study is a retrospective comparison of 2 patient groups both after pars plana vitrectomy due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Group 1 was managed with air as endotamponade (n = 52, mean age 61.2 years), group 2 without any endotamponade (n = 40, mean age 59.4 years). Classification of the proliferative diabetic retinopathy as described by Kroll et al. [5] in both groups: 23 and 29 patients with stage A resp., 24 and 10 patients with stage B resp., 5 and 1 patient with stage C respectively.77% of group 1 patients had an increase os vision by mean of 4.8 vision steps, in 70% of the group 2 patients vision increased by mean of 7.2 vision steps. Complications in both groups as follows: Rebleeding within 14 days 15% vs. 33%, development of secondary glaucoma in 9.6% and 17.5% resp., revitrectomy within 14 days were necessary in 3.8% resp. 2.5% of the patients, later revitrectomy in 13.5% vs. 42.5% of all patients.Air endotamponade turned out to be appropriate to reduce the rate of postoperative vitreous rebleeding after pars plana vitrectomy due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. We found no increase of secondary glaucoma or cataract.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Diabetic Retinopathy, Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative, Middle Aged, Vitreous Hemorrhage, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Treatment Outcome, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Vitrectomy, Secondary Prevention, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!