Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Pressure-pain threshold in the human tongue.

Authors: McMillan, AS; Walshaw, D;

Pressure-pain threshold in the human tongue.

Abstract

Aims: A new pressure algometer was used to quantify the pressure-pain threshold (PPT) in the human tongue. Methods: A custom-made device, controlled by software and a personal computer was used to measure the PPT in the anterior part of the tongues of 14 young, healthy subjects. The PPT was measured at 3 different rates of pressure application on 3 occasions, 1 week apart. Data were evaluated with analysis of covariance and intraclass correlations. Results: The prototype device had linear output characteristics within the operational range. The mean PPT ranged from 18 to 44 g. The PPT appeared to increase approximately linearly with increasing rate of pressure application (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the PPT on different experimental occasions. In individual subjects, the PPT was reliable and uniform. There were significant inter-subject differences in the PPT (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The PPT can be measured consistently in the anterior part of the tongue, provided the pressure rate is controlled. The new pressure algometer appears to have potential clinical utility for quantifying sensation in the human tongue.

link_to_subscribed_fulltext

Country
China (People's Republic of)
Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Pain Threshold, Pain measurement, Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Sensory thresholds, Reproducibility of Results, 600, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Microcomputers, Tongue, Sensory Thresholds, Confidence Intervals, Pressure, Humans, Female, Software

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!