
Measuring muscle strength and establishing paretic symptoms are done first of all by having the patient perform actions or movements that require normal muscle strength. Measuring or grading the strength of separate muscle groups is usually done by means of the so-called Medical Research Council (MRC) scale that runs from 0 to 5, with the movement against gravity as an important criterion. This scale is not very valid in tract 4 (more strength than needed to overcome gravity, but still subnormal). Using a manual dynamometer or a fixed dynamometer it is possible to measure the strength of most clinically important muscle groups of the extremities and to compare them with values found in a normal population. For following the individual patient with a neuromuscular disorder, strength measurement with the dynamometer is more reliable than grading using the MRC scale.
Diagnosis, Differential, Hand Strength, Isometric Contraction, Muscle Tonus, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Muscle, Skeletal, Diagnostic Equipment
Diagnosis, Differential, Hand Strength, Isometric Contraction, Muscle Tonus, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Muscle, Skeletal, Diagnostic Equipment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
