Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Wilms tumor].

Authors: N, Graf;
Abstract

Today the prognosis in children with nephroblastoma is excellent. With the combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation more than 80% of children can be cured. Because of acute toxicity and late effects of treatment (scoliosis, cardiotoxicity, fertility problems and second malignancies) a major issue in the management of children with this kind of malignancy is the reduction of chemotherapy and radiation. This is done in prospective multicenter studies. In 1989 the GPOH did join the SIOP 9 study for the treatment of Wilms' Tumors. All the SIOP studies mainly investigated the preoperative treatment. With the introduction of a centralized radiodiagnostic center in Germany (Prof. Tröger, Heidelberg) a high certainty in making the right diagnosis preoperatively without histological proof could be achieved. It could be shown in SIOP 9, that four weeks of preoperative chemotherapy with actinomycin-D and vincristine is as effective as eight weeks. 60% of patients with a localized nephroblastoma will have stage I disease at the time of surgery. The response to preoperative chemotherapy is of prognostic value. As a result of the NWTS and SIOP studies the postoperative stage and histological subtype are very important regarding prognosis. By reducing the dose of actinomycin-D to 2/3 in children under 12 kg of body weight problems with venous occlusive disease could be minimized. In the now ongoing study SIOP 93-01/GPOH postoperative treatment for patients with stage I disease and intermediate malignancy is randomized to a short and a long branch.

Keywords

Infant, Prognosis, Combined Modality Therapy, Wilms Tumor, Kidney Neoplasms, Pediatric Nursing, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Child, Preschool, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Prospective Studies, Child

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!