Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Process assessment: importance and current limits].

Authors: P, Michel; L R, Salmi; M, Sibé; M T, Salmi;

[Process assessment: importance and current limits].

Abstract

Assessment of processes in health care is needed for the measurement of six domains of quality of care (appropriateness, security, respect and caring, availability, continuity and timeliness). We propose here a typology of care, organisational and management processes. Process indicators can be classified according to objectives of the evaluation, type of processes, concerned healthcare professionals, and stage of the process. Process assessment is hindered by two main difficulties. Due to the lack of data about processes in information systems and in medical records, specific data collection is often needed and impede the feasibility of routine evaluation. The second difficulty is related to the lack of information about the properties of the indicators, their appropriateness (capacity to infer improvement actions from the result of the indicators), their operational properties (cost of data collection and acceptability by the concerned professionals), and their measurement properties (reliability and validity). Process assessment is strongly needed because outcome assessment can be not possible or not appropriate. The lack of information about the process-outcome relationship is the major obstacle and the main contra-indication to its use. Validation of process indicators is therefore an important research area for the future.

Keywords

Research, Process Assessment, Health Care, Quality of Life, Humans, Delivery of Health Care, Information Systems

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!