Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Living donors: immunologic factors].

Authors: P, Kolevski; Z, Popov; A, Hristova-Dimceva; D, Petrovski; K, Cakalaroski; N, Ivanovski;

[Living donors: immunologic factors].

Abstract

Transplantations using grafts from living donors were performed on 70 patients with chronic kidney failure, 66 of them involved matching recipients-donors and four involved non-matching recipients-donors. Immunological data were analyzed in 56 pairs of recipients and patients. Of these pairs, one was identical, seven had three identical antigens, 46 were haploidentical at A and B loci, one pair was identical in one antigen and one pair was completely incompatible. The survival of transplanted kidneys largely depended on the degree of histocompatibility. In 33 (59%) transplantations kidneys are functioning from more than 36 months. In the group of seven transplanted pairs with three identical antigens kidneys are functioning in six cases, with four of them functioning from more than 72 months. In the remaining patients (41 patients [73%]) kidneys are functioning, with 8 of them functioning from more than 10 years. The existence of HLA antibodies was investigated. Preimmunization was found in 18 (32%) patients and correlated with the number of blood transfusions. Rejection crises were observed in 12 (21%) patients. As the number of blood transfusions per patient increased the number of rejection crises decreased. Rejection crises were also observed in haploidentical pairs, with a relative risk > 30%. They occurred in the first 2 weeks following transplantation.

Keywords

Graft Rejection, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Histocompatibility Testing, Graft Survival, Living Donors, Humans, Renal Insufficiency, Erythrocyte Transfusion, Prognosis, Kidney Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!