Utilization of standardized local and waste resources is of great importance to the economic development in the world. Besides, application of waste material results in more eco-friendly concrete at the same time. In this study, the effects of two different new fillers, named as sea sand powder (SS), as a local available material and olive waste bottom ash, (OW) as a waste material of different proportions incorporated with two different quantities of superplasticizer (SP), on physical and mechanical properties of SCC were aimed to be investigated and compared to those of limestone powder (LS) as a common filler. For these aimes rheology of fresh concrete, compressive and tensile strengths, initial defects, fracture energy and volume changes during hydration were measured. Results showed that there is no considerable difference in hardened properties of SCC by using SS instead of LS; however, differences in volumetric shrinkage and rheological properties, especially for bleeding and segregation, were more pronounced. On the other hand, OW mixes show different outcomes. OW gives more viscosity to SCC mixes and eliminates segregation and bleeding of the mixes containing this filler. Nevertheless, reduced compressive strength and fracture energy and increased volumetric shrinkage and porosity in these mixes were noticeable compared to LS mixes; however, when 5% OW was used, the results found to be more tolerable. Keywords: Self-consolidated concrete, Olive waste ash, Sea sand powder, Limestone powder, Compressive strengths, Fracture energy